First of all compie/ST is a devestating bronze combo. Many players, myself included use it commonly as Phoe. Even as Phoe the benefit of compie/ST is that it saves a ton of wood over CA/ST. Phoe's woodchopping bonus is not as impressive vs other civs on a percentage basis in bronze as it is in stone. Thus one can run short of wood even as Phoe when using CA/ST. None of this means that I won't use CA/ST with Phoe, however, but I find myself using comp/ST quite alot in cases where I am not simply continually raiding someone from early bronze w/mounted units. If I am building up a large mid/late bronze army as Phoe it is likely to be compie/ST now.
As Yam I have seen players do the same thing and even as Palmy. With egypt .. that chariot bonus is simply too strong and don't expect me to use comp/ST.. as with yam.. those ST don't upgrade in Iron to cats. I also do it quite often when I get bab, which being a low civ, I am not likely to be early bronze rushing anyone decent.
Comp/ST dies horribly to cats' area damage as we all have seen.
Back to the initial question about using slinger/chariots as Rome vs comp/ST.. I ran a bunch of tests in the SB and found it quite effective.. to have 20 slingers and 10 chariots vs 15 comps and 5 ST's.. The slings/char often won the battle even though the comps were Mino in some cases and always the slingers started just outside the comps range and took many arrows approaching. It's really imprtant to kill most of the comps quickly because then the ST are in big trouble.A key is not to rush the chariots in without slingers as they gey hurt before the slingers start hitting the comps.
Everything in my tests had only the tool age upgrades so the slings had +1 atk and range but not the expensive bronze shield.
Slingers die horribly to cav and don't like chariots or camels either. I added 3 cav per side and that came reasonably close to balancing out the battles as the comps shoot up the cav while the other sides cav hurt slingers and/or whack chariots that get on the ST's.
So, yes ,the combo is effective if you clearly out number the comps/ST. However, it isn't overwhelming as sometimes I lost. I also varied which side the computer played as well as how much management I did.
However, should you do it in a real game ?? It takes alot of food to make and those slingers are dead meat to anything other than archers and there're worth about 2 cents on the dollar in iron. It may get you thru bronze.. but there likely may be better ways that make more sence as far as the entire game is concerned.
Also a smart Minoan makes several camels vs Rome. Camels don't like good archers and Rome can make only imps. Rome's cav or char don't like fighting camels. If the Minoan has a few camels you'll find this less effective.
I have found recently that the more ST I make in bronze, the better I do as long as I have them reasonably guarded. One ST shot kills one comp and two rocks kill a CA. As Sebsoft said, I believe,a good defence is simply to have a couple more ST than he has. The roman can also have a few chariots around just out of range of comp fire to deal with any charging camels or cav. Roman swordies are great at that too. The key point is not to go charging willy-nilly into 15 minocomps w/just a few swordies or chariots. Kill some comps w/your ST's and then you can charge at the enemy ST's.
While your idea certainly has merit.. I personally,would probably make something other than slingers with all that food if my only use for them was mid/late bronze defence.
...neilkaz...
[This message has been edited by neilkaz (edited 08-28-99).]