Brugle, I don't want to argue it either (well, alright, just one more time...), so let's just say that:
First of all, and most importantly, I have removed my whispers from the previous two posts, which could have been interpreted as patronising to some readers.
I can understand that there could be considerable debate about whether those said pavilions are in fact disconnected from the block at all. I personally consider them to be separate, due to the fact that they are on an isolated road which is not used for anything else. I understand that again, you may believe differently. However, if I were to use that block, or a similar block, in a city, that pavilion road would probably end up as the labor pickup for a large industrial area, which is obviously connected/related to the block, then I would consider that to be 'problem' solved. So much the better for me that it was designed that way rather than tacked on later, as I am wont to do.I have used this general technique in my cities, but always the pavilion has been part of another (usually worker) block, the road to which leads through the (manor) block which is to recieve entertainment coverage by means of the passing performers. Or I would connect two blocks by means of a pavilion, such as Xtof's reply #87 to this thread, and inject entertainers from both ends.
Overall, I'm not saying that the technique of using passing desination-walker entertainers to provide coverage to houses is at all uncommon, just that Xtof's particular way of doing it is not a method I have seen done before. Now I come to think about it, it's a rather good idea and I'll probably try it myself.
Thankyou. Let's put this to rest now. (although having had my 'last word', you're entitled to yours...)
Great Itjtawy by the way Brugle - I've just had a look at it, and it runs like clockwork. I expect I'll have loads of questions in the other thread once I've had a proper must over it!
[This message has been edited by WinterPharaoh (edited 10-06-2004 @ 08:42 AM).]