Quote:
Posted on 03/08/04 @ 10:40 AM
Rating 5.0
Rating: 5
Nice Map.
Additional Comments:
The little island in the center was screwed...it was half connected to the land and half to the water...Looked really weird. Otherwise...GREAT MAP!!!!!!!
Quote:
Posted on 02/07/04 @ 02:07 PM
Rating 5.0
Rating: 5
I play it too
Additional Comments:
i'm playing it a few months and i really like nw i'm also in the ladder!
NW RULEZZZZZZZZZZZZzz
Quote:
Posted on 02/15/04 @ 11:38 AM
Rating 5.0
Rating: 5
(Insert Rating analysis here)
Additional Comments:
Really Awesome map! Lot's o' resources.
Quote:
Posted on 12/29/03 @ 12:54 PM
Rating 4.0
Rating: 5
works fine, nice to play, but lack of difference to migration maps only 4. light is good though
Additional Comments:
none
Quote:
Posted on 02/29/04 @ 11:12 AM
Rating 2.0
I see the forests in norway EVERYDAY... and i have never seen skraelings...
I personally have nothing against the people that recieved these reviews (heck one of them was a review I got). The problem is these reviews are generally worthless. They help the scriptor in no way at all. And a lot of times might mislead people into downloading or not downloading a map.
As it is right now our rms ratings are useless. Making changes to the rating have been talked about in the past, but that is all it was....talk. Nothing was done and as far as I know nothing is being done. See here for the most 'recent' attempt: A suggestion was made about adopting AOKH's rms reviewing guidelines: These ratings are caused mainly by a lack of guidelines/examples of what a good review is. Personally I think the review rules employed at AOKH and suggested in the thread linked above are appropriate. You can view them here: What I propose is that It would be nice to have 2 real reviews for each map script in the downloads section but perhaps that is a bit eager. For now we can aim to review 1 rms each per week. Please post any comments here. Also indicate Here is an example of a review I just did using the guidelines above: [This message has been edited by Pascal9872 (edited 03-08-2004 @ 08:15 PM).]
1)the moderators remove all the ridiculous 1 line reviews from the downloads section
2)We as the scripting community start reviewing the random maps in the download section using the guidelines discussed in the AOKH thread.
3)Offer a place where people can ask to have their rms reviewed.
1) if you are interested in participating in reviewing maps
2) once you have reviewed a map, which one
3) if you have any maps you want to have reviewed. If you do please provide the name and a brief description
Guide to Debugging RMS
Download my RMS here
Help improve RMS reviewing here
A monk I need a monk.
I thought therefore I was.