Quoted from Xzyiothe:

Vote: Beelzebub

Scum.

Explain?

I second this, I am pretty sure XZY has a reason behind this semi random vote.

*looks around*

Is ABU even playing in this game?

Why, of course I am!

Vote: Ashrzr

You! Go update Resrvoir Dogs! NAO!

Only Beelzebub would kill Noodle, unless someone framed him. But I believe I'm the only one here who could come to this conclusion.

So, me or him.

Discounting random choice, but any decent mafia team never kills at random.

The chances that Beelzebub is scum is significant enough for me to place my own life on it, even without hearing anything from him

No no no, your life is important. My life is important, so you stop epic failing. I am sane enough to know to target Rot > Count > Xzyiothe > Blatant > Noodle > Azur > Shanks (If all else fails, choose an Orange > Red > Green) , but I won't even bother arguing since it's all WIFOM and metagaming.

Only Beelzebub would kill Noodle, unless someone framed him.

I would say you, but it can't be you.

Quoted from Xzyiothe:

Only Beelzebub would kill Noodle, unless someone framed him. But I believe I'm the only one here who could come to this conclusion.

So, me or him.

So it's just metagaming then? In that case, I shall ignore you.

Vote: Briguy

Yeah, I don't like the whole 'It was X because only X would kill Y' thing. It might be right, but we shouldn't be basing stuff on that yet without more solid evidence.

Unvote

So... I'd guess Dragon got some dirt on Briguy?
Vote: Briguy

I think it was a random vote, actually. But I don't see a better plan.

Vote: Briguy.

Okay, I can really sympathize with Rot right now. Having an inactive mafia is a pathetic and degrading experience. Somebody email Briguy or something.

I had notified Rot to smack Briguy in the face. He should be coming soon; if not, I'd think it would be safe to assume that he's a mafioso stalling for time.

Sorry I forgot I was in this. I'm Nacht Jaeger a RBer.

And I RBed Noodle last night.

Lies. You coulda come up with something better than the old "I blocked the only person who cannot possibly confirm whether he was blocked or not" ploy.

Nacht doesn't make sense as an RBer. My role makes perfect sense (well, mostly.)

I can prove myself if you want, let's see how the day goes and I'll RB the scummiest person tonight.

@Xzy, who would make sense as an RBer in your opinion? I think it would be hard to pick a forumer to classify as one.

I can prove myself if you want, let's see how the day goes and I'll RB the scummiest person tonight.

The only way to prove yourself is roleblocking an informative role in a Rot game. How does this help you?

@Xzy, who would make sense as an RBer in your opinion? I think it would be hard to pick a forumer to classify as one.

Not Nacht because he's never around.

Seems like a half-assed attempt to make up a claim to me. His result is another clue.

*nods* *nods*
Now we either lynch Briguy or let the Day go on a bit longer. And I'd choose the latter as more discussions = good and if activity dwindle, we could also have our back-up and lynch Briguy, Mr. I-RBed-A-Dead-Player. Most likely he's the killer, saying he targeted Noodle to prevent Tracker/Watcher rape; well, Noodle the Tracker is dead but his mason must be the Watcher.

O, look, Hooky and sneaky, let's abuse them, shall we?
Vote: Hooker

@Xzy, who would make sense as an RBer in your opinion? I think it would be hard to pick a forumer to classify as one.

Briguy's got a good point here.

Nacht is not as inactive as you think. He posts often in BFME2H and less often at EEH. He doesn't play mafias anymore though, I don't think, which is why it's interesting that he's, so far, apparently included in this one.

And I have to say, all he had to do was not claim as a roleblocker, and then have to cover himself by saying he blocked the only person who's dead, if he was scum. Surely he wouldn't make it that hard on himself. But who knows, it's Briguy who doesn't play mafia that much IIRC.

The only way to prove yourself is roleblocking an informative role in a Rot game. How does this help you?

If he roleblocked the scummiest person, that means there's a chance he's roleblocking the person with a kill. And if the kill fails then that proves Briguy and also gives us an excellent lead. It's not just by blocking informative roles that we find out if a roleblocker is telling the truth.

Thank you Ash for using some common sense. It's not my fault I happened to RB Noodle, I had no idea he'd die, infact I picked him because I assumed he would be protected, because people like killing Noodle all the time.

RBer's are obviously a useful role, it would be a shame to lose one so early in the game.

As for who to pressure next, I think Beelz would be a good target, he got off the hook from RCing the 1st time, and now he is the one leading the pressuring, most likely so he wont be the one who's pressured. Plus if Beelz is scum, we can keep in mind that it was DragonQ who deflected the pressure off him. Sounds like a pretty good lead to me.

Vote: Beelzebub

Quoted from Briguy:

because people like killing Noodle all the time.

It's so true.

infact I picked him because I assumed he would be protected, because people like killing Noodle all the time.

How does this make sense?

Vote: Briguy

infact I picked him because I assumed he would be protected, because people like killing Noodle all the time.

How does this make sense?

Yeah, I was just thinking that. I think you're confused, Briguy.

lol

How does this make sense?

Because if he was protected, he wouldn't have died, ergo I wouldn't be in the situation I am right now with people bitching "lol ur scum cuz the guy u RBed died on the first night!!!". I don't get how it doesn't make sense...

Because if he was protected, he wouldn't have died, ergo I wouldn't be in the situation I am right now with people bitching "lol ur scum cuz the guy u RBed died on the first night!!!". I don't get how it doesn't make sense...

So instead of targeting potential scum to try and block a kill, you targeted Noodle in the hopes that he wouldn't die and would therefore make you less suspicious?

Wait...Noodle was a mason. So he probably told his mason partner whether his track worked or not.

Because if he was protected, he wouldn't have died, ergo I wouldn't be in the situation I am right now with people bitching "lol ur scum cuz the guy u RBed died on the first night!!!". I don't get how it doesn't make sense...

Because that's never what I think about when I'm a roleblocker?

Wait...Noodle was a mason. So he probably told his mason partner whether his track worked or not.

I doubt it.

So instead of targeting potential scum to try and block a kill, you targeted Noodle in the hopes that he wouldn't die and would therefore make you less suspicious?

Just cause he was protected doesn't mean he's not scum, so it's not like I was trying to RB a town role, I just didn't want the guy I RBed to die.

Wait...Noodle was a mason. So he probably told his mason partner whether his track worked or not.

Hopefully, but I doubt Rot would even send back any results at all to a dead player, I could be wrong though.

I just didn't want the guy I RBed to die.

Roleblockers never worry about this.

Roleblockers never worry about this.

Wow just because you do something a certain way doesn't mean everyone does it that way, I have my own strategies of using my roles. Just let me prove myself tonight and let's drop this until tomorrow.

No. They never worry about it. Not just me.

Popular strategies?

1) Roleblock someone, more the information the better off the town will be
2) Roleblock someone in anticipation to make them claim. Waiting till day 2 with a double-roleblock works if there's no other leads.
3) Abstain, no information. No chance at a failed kill. Least common move.

Afaik there's no number 4 in any game I've been in so far. Personally, I do number 1, but see number 2 quite common.

Also, proving your ability does not prove your allegiance.